Turbidity and Trout
The Effects of Increased Turbidity on Trout Behavior and Angling Success
Trout fishing often hinges on clear water conditions, where sight-feeding fish can readily detect prey and lures. However, when turbidity—essentially the cloudiness or murkiness of the water—rises due to runoff, algae blooms, or other disturbances, trout behavior and angling success can change dramatically. Understanding these effects can help anglers adapt their strategies and continue to find success even in less-than-ideal water conditions.
The Impact of Turbidity on Trout Senses
Turbidity reduces visibility in the water, making it more difficult for trout to rely solely on their keen eyesight. In response, they compensate by increasing their reliance on other senses, such as their lateral line system and olfactory abilities.
Lateral Line Sensitivity: Trout possess a highly developed lateral line, which allows them to detect vibrations and movement in the water. In murky conditions, they become more attuned to disturbances caused by prey or anglers’ flies.
Olfactory Adaptation: With impaired vision, trout depend more on scent cues. This shift makes natural-scented baits or flies with organic attractants more effective in turbid waters.
Feeding Behavior in Murky Water
As turbidity increases, trout modify their feeding strategies to compensate for decreased visibility:
Reduced Sight-Feeding Efficiency: In clear water, trout actively pursue and ambush prey based on visual cues. In contrast, murky conditions diminish their ability to track fast-moving insects, making them more selective and opportunistic.
Preference for Larger, Slower Prey: Since distinguishing small, fast-moving insects becomes more challenging, trout tend to focus on larger, slower-moving prey that creates noticeable vibrations or silhouettes.
Shift to Reactive Feeding: Instead of actively hunting, trout often wait for food to pass closer to them, striking at prey that comes within their immediate sensory range.
Increased Use of Cover and Structure: Murky water provides a sense of security, reducing the need for trout to seek deep or highly oxygenated areas. Instead, they often move to structures such as undercut banks, submerged logs, and slower-moving pools, where they can detect and ambush prey with greater efficiency.
Adjustments in Activity Levels
Turbidity not only affects feeding behavior but also influences overall trout activity:
Less Spooky Behavior: In crystal-clear water, trout are highly cautious, often darting away at the slightest disturbance. Increased turbidity reduces their awareness of potential threats, making them more approachable.
More Daytime Feeding: In clear conditions, trout often feed actively during low-light periods (early morning and evening) to avoid predation. However, in turbid conditions, they feel less exposed, leading to more consistent feeding throughout the day.
Greater Dependence on Current Seams: With reduced visibility, trout favor current seams, eddies, and transition zones where food is naturally funneled toward them. These areas become prime feeding locations in murky water.
Implications for Fly Fishers
Understanding how turbidity affects trout behavior allows fly fishers to make informed tactical adjustments:
Fly Selection: Opt for larger, darker, or more visible fly patterns, such as black Woolly Buggers, large stoneflies, or articulated streamers. These patterns create stronger silhouettes and vibrations that help trout locate them.
Retrieve and Presentation Adjustments: Slow down retrieves and incorporate erratic movements to mimic the behavior of disoriented or struggling prey.
Strategic Positioning: Focus on areas with moderate current where trout can easily intercept food without expending excessive energy.
Use of Attractors: In addition to natural presentations, consider using flies with added flash, bead heads, or rubber legs to enhance visibility and movement in murky water.
Conclusion
While increased turbidity alters trout behavior, it does not eliminate the opportunity for productive fly fishing. By recognizing the ways in which trout adapt to these conditions, anglers can modify their approach to maximize success. Whether by adjusting fly selection, changing presentation techniques, or targeting different water types, understanding the impact of turbidity will make any fly fisher more adaptable and effective on the water.
Bibliography
Allan, J. D. (1995). Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters. Springer Science & Business Media.
Behnke, R. J. (2002). Trout and Salmon of North America. Free Press.
Bjornn, T. C., & Reiser, D. W. (1991). Habitat requirements of salmonids in streams. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 19, 83-138.
Dunham, J. B., & Vinyard, G. L. (1997). Relationships between water temperature, predation, and the distribution of trout in streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 54(7), 1315-1321.
Gregory, R. S., & Northcote, T. G. (1993). Surface, planktonic, and benthic foraging by juvenile chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in turbid laboratory conditions. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 50(2), 233-240.
Newcombe, C. P., & MacDonald, D. D. (1991). Effects of suspended sediments on aquatic ecosystems. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 11(1), 72-82.
Sweka, J. A., & Hartman, K. J. (2001). Influence of turbidity on prey consumption by brook trout. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 130(5), 1256-1261.
Waters, T. F. (1995). Sediment in streams: Sources, biological effects, and control. American Fisheries Society.
